The Hidden Costs of Brick Construction

Brick. It’s timeless, durable, and undeniably charming. I get it—there’s something about a brick home that evokes tradition and permanence. But let me ask you this: is that charm worth the hidden costs? After years in the construction industry, I’ve come to realize that brick is one of the most overrated materials we use. It’s costly, inefficient, and outdated—and yet, we cling to it like it’s the holy grail of homebuilding.

Let’s peel back the layers and expose the true price of brick construction. Spoiler alert: it’s not as solid as it seems.

The Labor Problem

First things first—bricklaying is an art form. It takes years to master the skill, and finding qualified masons is becoming increasingly difficult. I’ve seen projects stall for weeks because there simply weren’t enough workers available to lay bricks. And when you do find skilled labor, it doesn’t come cheap.

On one project I oversaw early in my career, the labor costs for bricklaying alone were nearly double what we’d budgeted. Why? Because every single brick has to be placed by hand—a painstakingly slow process that depends entirely on human precision. Compare that to modern methods like modular construction, where entire walls are pre-assembled in factories with millimeter accuracy. The difference is night and day.

Weather Dependency

Here’s another dirty secret about brick: it hates bad weather. Rain, freezing temperatures, extreme heat—all of these can bring bricklaying to a grinding halt. I’ve stood on job sites where workers packed up for the day because the mortar wouldn’t set properly in damp conditions. Every delay adds costs—not just in labor but in extended timelines, equipment rentals, and financing fees.

In contrast, modular construction happens indoors, in climate-controlled environments where weather isn’t even a factor. The result? Predictable schedules and fewer headaches.

Material Waste

Brick might seem like a sturdy option, but let’s talk about waste. Between broken bricks during transport and excess mortar on-site, there’s a significant amount of material that ends up in the dumpster rather than in your walls. On one project I visited recently, nearly 15% of the bricks ordered were damaged before they even made it to the site—money literally thrown away.

Modern materials like MgO SIPs (magnesium oxide structural insulated panels) are engineered to minimize waste. They’re precision-cut in factories and arrive ready for installation, with virtually zero leftovers or breakage. Why aren’t we using more of them? Tradition—and an unwillingness to embrace change.

Energy Efficiency—or Lack Thereof

Here’s a question I ask every homeowner who insists on brick: have you thought about your energy bills? Brick has poor insulation properties compared to modern materials like SIPs or insulated steel panels. Sure, you can add insulation behind the brick veneer—but why not use a material that’s inherently energy-efficient?

I once toured a neighborhood where every home was brick-clad but poorly insulated behind the walls. The homeowners were spending thousands each year on heating and cooling because their walls couldn’t regulate temperature effectively. When we built a modular home nearby using MgO SIPs, the energy savings were immediate—and dramatic.

Transportation Costs

Brick is heavy—really heavy—and transporting it isn’t cheap or environmentally friendly. The carbon footprint of moving thousands of bricks to a job site is significant, not to mention the fuel costs involved. Compare that to factory-built wall systems that arrive pre-assembled and ready to install in one trip—it’s a no-brainer from both an economic and sustainability perspective.

Maintenance Headaches

Let’s talk long-term costs: bricks may last forever, but mortar doesn’t. Over time, mortar joints deteriorate and need repointing—a labor-intensive process that can cost thousands of dollars depending on the size of your home. Then there’s the issue of efflorescence—that white residue caused by water seeping through bricks—which can be unsightly and difficult to remove.

I’ve spoken with homeowners who regretted their decision to go with brick after realizing how much maintenance was required over time. Modern materials like MgO SIPs don’t have these issues—they’re moisture-resistant, fireproof, and require virtually no upkeep.

The Emotional Argument

I get it—brick feels solid and permanent, like something you can pass down through generations. But permanence shouldn’t come at the expense of affordability or efficiency. When I see families struggling to afford homes because traditional methods inflate prices unnecessarily, I can’t help but question our attachment to materials like brick.

At Haüsa Homes, we’re proving that you don’t need brick—or any other outdated material—to build homes that last for generations. Our modular homes are engineered for durability, energy efficiency, and affordability—all without sacrificing quality or design.

A Challenge to Tradition

So here’s my challenge: let go of tradition for tradition’s sake. Brick might look timeless, but its hidden costs are anything but sustainable—economically or environmentally. If we want to make housing more affordable and accessible for everyone, we need to embrace smarter materials and methods.

The next time you admire a brick home, ask yourself: how much did it really cost—not just financially but in wasted resources and inefficiencies? And then imagine what could be achieved if we replaced those bricks with something better.

It’s time to build differently—and Haüsa Homes is leading the way.

Next Article Preview: 5. Why Timber Framing Falls Short in Modern Construction
"Timber framing has been a cornerstone of homebuilding for centuries—but does it still make sense today? From fire risks to pest vulnerabilities and sustainability concerns, I’ll explore why this traditional method is failing us—and what we should be using instead."